nanog mailing list archives
Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:21:55 +0100
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 21:30 +0100, JP Velders wrote:
[ ... ] I think the risk of ISPs handing out /64s is very small. Actually I expect most of the consumer ISPs (and they are the ones with the large number of customers) to hand out /128s.Uhm, one of my private (as in I'm the consumer) ISP's over here in Holland gives me a /48... Granted it's done through a tunnelserver and labeled experimental, but they handed out /60's when it was based on sixbone space... http://www.xs4all.nl/uk/allediensten/experimenteel/ipv6.php I do believe XS4All is one of the larger consumer ISP's over here.
XS4ALL is around 160k DSL lines last time I heard. Due note that they are a clued ISP unlike many others. The tunnelserver is only for people not using the PPP sessions. Folks with DSL and PPP can also get 'native' IPv6 by doing a PPP6 session next to the normal PPP session. Afaik most of the usage of the IPv6 there has moved away from 6bone and migrated to their RIR prefix already, though users can pick between them. Erik, comments and more details? :) Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Pekka Savola (Nov 30)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Owen DeLong (Nov 30)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Nils Ketelsen (Dec 01)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery JP Velders (Dec 01)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Jeroen Massar (Dec 02)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery JP Velders (Dec 01)