nanog mailing list archives
Re: no whois info ?
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:23:32 -0500
Michael.Dillon () radianz com writes:
Interesting how many companies are "parked" at a lawyers office, i.e. the official address of the company is that of it's legal firm. One wonders why an abuse organization would not use this same tactic and register a legal firm as the administrative contact.
How much do you suppose the law firm would charge you for handling the email influx if you got joe-jobbed? Sysadmin time is cheaper than lawyer time, last I checked. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: no whois info ?, (continued)
- Re: no whois info ? Mike Tancsa (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Ken Gilmour (Dec 10)
- Re: no whois info ? Janet Sullivan (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Mike Tancsa (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Rich Kulawiec (Dec 11)
- Re: no whois info ? Janet Sullivan (Dec 11)
- Re: no whois info ? william(at)elan.net (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Janet Sullivan (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? william(at)elan.net (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Michael . Dillon (Dec 13)
- Re: no whois info ? Robert E . Seastrom (Dec 13)
- Re: no whois info ? Jack Bates (Dec 13)
- Re: no whois info ? Rich Kulawiec (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Janet Sullivan (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Steve Gibbard (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Alex Bligh (Dec 12)
- Re: no whois info ? Peter John Hill (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Mike Tancsa (Dec 09)
- Re: no whois info ? Peter John Hill (Dec 09)