nanog mailing list archives

Re: verizon.net and other email grief


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:36:37 -0500

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:36:12 PST, "william(at)elan.net" said:

They are correct in this case. The address entered in RFC2821 MAIL FROM
is "Bounces-To" address and it must accept bounced email and as such it 
must accept incoming emails. If the address does not accept traffic as
you indicated should not be used in MAIL FROM and different adddress from 
local machine should be used. Please read email RFCs and then you'll

Yes - *you* know that the address you put in the MAIL FROM: should be one
that you know is willing to accept any bounces you may be about to
generate, and *I* know that.

The problem is that the spammer (I include A/V companies that still
generate rejection notices) knows that as well - and doesn't feel
the same need to follow the rules and be a good netizen.

Yes, it's a royal pain trying to follow a protocol when you know up front
that there's a 70% to 90% chance that the other person is intentionally
failing to follow it....



Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: