nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda]
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 01:01:03 +0100
On 30-nov-04, at 23:32, Scott Morris wrote:
At large NAP points (the higher order ISP's) this may make some sense because of the ubiquity of larger scale lines.
Why would geographical aggregation need bigger lines?
Current thread:
- Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 30)
- RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Scott Morris (Nov 30)