![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Homing Question
From: babylon () egenius org
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:50:42 -0400 (EDT)
No it was because we (Sprint, where I worked at that time) still felt that it was valuable. The change happened a couple of months after I left. From what I was told when the change happened, it was decided that it was no longer more important to do, then the pain it caused, because of massive increases in router memory, and the ability to do prefix-filters to clamp down on large eruptions. jon
Out of the ether, babylon () egenius org spewed forth the following bitstream:Actually Sprint continued filtering for 2 years after Sean left.But was that because they could not figure out how to turn it off? AlanC -- A plot, if there is to be one, must be a secret. A secret that, if | we only knew it, would dispel our frustration, lead us to salvation; | TSILB or else the knowing of it in itself would be salvation. |
Current thread:
- BGP Homing Question Rick Lowery (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Joe Abley (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question babylon (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Jared Mauch (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Joe Provo (Aug 30)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Daniel Roesen (Aug 30)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Joe Abley (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP Homing Question babylon (Aug 27)
- RE: BGP Homing Question Michel Py (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP Homing Question Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 28)
- RE: BGP Homing Question Michel Py (Aug 28)