nanog mailing list archives
Re: That MIT paper
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 13 Aug 2004 02:16:36 +0000
At root and gTLD servers I assume DNS traffic occupies significantly more than 3% of all traffic there. Still, a 1% increase remains 1%.Sure, but the ratio still plays out. ...
i must have misspoken. when i asked "what if 20,000 sites decreased their cache utilization by 1% due to a general lowering of TTL's inspired by MIT's paper" i was wondering if anyone thought that the result would be a straight across-the-board increase in traffic at the root servers. there are theories that say yes. other theories say it'll be higher. others, lower. any study that fails to address these questions is worse than useless. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: That MIT paper Joe Shen (Aug 10)
- Re: That MIT paper Siegbert Marschall (Aug 10)
- Re: That MIT paper Paul Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: That MIT paper David G. Andersen (Aug 11)
- Re: That MIT paper Randy Bush (Aug 11)
- Re: That MIT paper Niels Bakker (Aug 12)
- Re: That MIT paper David G. Andersen (Aug 12)
- Re: That MIT paper Paul Vixie (Aug 12)
- Re: That MIT paper Randy Bush (Aug 12)
- Re: That MIT paper David G. Andersen (Aug 11)
- Re: That MIT paper William Allen Simpson (Aug 12)
- ttl for ns William Allen Simpson (Aug 12)
- Re: ttl for ns Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 13)
- Re: ttl for ns William Allen Simpson (Aug 13)
- Re: ttl for ns William Allen Simpson (Aug 13)
- Re: ttl for ns John Payne (Aug 13)
- Re: ttl for ns William Allen Simpson (Aug 13)