Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?

["Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez" <rico.gonzalez () gmail com>]

No Rafi, I'm not "confused", I replied recounting what my organization
deployed as a replacement for the hardware which Wayne is currently
working on.  Please refrain from further ad-hominem personal attacks
in violation of this forum's charter.

Just because different list participants have different approaches for
solving a particular problem doesn't mean one is necessarily "wrong",
and needs to be lambasted.  This is what makes NANOG so diverse and
great, like this country of ours.

---Rico, who is putting "NA" back in "NANOG"

On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:13:37 +0300 (IDT), Rafi Sadowsky
<rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il> wrote:
> Hi Rick
>
>  You seem slightly confused:
>
> All the URLs you sent are for 10/100 ethernet switches/hubs
> (I inserted the relevant title below each url )
>
> --
>         Rafi
>
> ## On 2004-08-11 10:39 -0400 Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez typed:
>
> R"G>
> R"G> Wayne,
> R"G>
> R"G> My organization has recently switched from a similar infrastructure to
> R"G> the following:
> R"G>
> R"G> Core: http://www.svec.com/PRODUCTS/fd800ds/FD800DS2.htm
>         FD800DS 8-port Dual Speed Hub
>
> R"G> Distribution layer: http://www.svec.com/Products/FD521EDS.HTM
>         FD521 5-port Fast Ethernet Switch
>
> R"G> Wire closet: http://www.svec.com/Products/fd510eds.htm
>         FD510 5-Port Fast Ethernet Hub
>
> R"G>
> R"G> We have seen a noticeable increase in performance, ROI, and
> R"G> manageability following the migration away from the prior 3Com
> R"G> solution.  If you have any implementation-specific questions, please
> R"G> mail me off list and I'll do my best to answer them.
> R"G>
> R"G> With regards,
> R"G> ---Rico
> R"G>