nanog mailing list archives
Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other
From: Bill Owens <owens () nysernet org>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:21:33 -0400
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:05:58PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Whereupon, 18 USC 1030 (b), becomes *very* relevant, given the language of 18 USC (a) (2) (C). The minimum penalty is 'up to a year imprisonment'. given any 'extenuating circumstances' and it could be up to 20 years.
Robert, Given the steep penalty, would you do me the favor of forwarding your netblocks so that I can null-route them now, and avoid any risk of trespassing on your network? Thanks, Bill.
Current thread:
- Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Robert Bonomi (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Bill Owens (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Tony Rall (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Matt Hess (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Roland Perry (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Daniel Reed (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Jon Lewis (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Steve Atkins (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other james edwards (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Scott Weeks (Aug 06)
- Re: Research - Valid Data Gathering vs. Annoying Other Daniel Golding (Aug 06)
(Thread continues...)