nanog mailing list archives
Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap?
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 21:19:19 +0200
On 06.08.2004 20:51 Dan Hollis wrote:
If you want low-latency you dont use ADSL. My SDSL connection: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.454/2.544/6.587/0.187 ms
At least here in Germany, SDSL is much more expensive than ADSL. Hence using FastPath may make sense ... Arnold btw: what does your rtt show? The *DSL path may me much shorter than from you to the next IP hop.
Current thread:
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap?, (continued)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Deepak Jain (Aug 04)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Jeff Cole (Aug 04)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 04)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Randy Bush (Aug 05)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 05)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? John Lyons (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Sam Stickland (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Arnold Nipper (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Dan Hollis (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Arnold Nipper (Aug 06)
- Re: low-latency bandwidth for cheap? Randy Bush (Aug 05)