nanog mailing list archives

RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ?


From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:31:32 +0100 (BST)


On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:

I was surprised by the similarities between the 7507 and 7513. Why EOL
the one device that has a pleasing form factor ? There are MANY
providers who would be quite happy with ~ 600 mbps? That's a lot of
billings...

From past experience there is no way you can get a 7507 to switch 600Mbps..

As for EOL, not sure.. the only deployments I've seen lately of 75xx have been 
as aggregators for WAN circuits and theres usually a GSR doing the work behind 
it, perhaps people are still buying 7513s for their card capacity?

Steve


Alexander Hagen
Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rafi Sadowsky [mailto:rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il] 
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 9:38 PM
To: Alexander Hagen
Cc: 'Rafi Sadowsky'; North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
orother vendor ?


Hi Alexander 

 I'm not sure what you're trying to say 
You asked why the Cisco website tool won't give you a 7505 as a config
option I replied that it's EOL - with a quote from Cisco website

 All I see in the HTML table you sent is that the 7507(or 7513) is
better
than a 7505 - is there a non-obvious point I missed ?





Current thread: