nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mailserver requirements
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 17:57:23 -0400
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:42:28 +0200, Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de> said:
Anyway... it's a heuristic which definately does give false positives. The only requirement is that IF a domain/host accepts mail there MUST be a postmaster@ address.
If you squint and cross your eyes, you can even convince yourself that RFC2821 says it's OK for said address to be bouncing due to over-quota conditions, because the requirement is for existence, not for usability. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Mailserver requirements, (continued)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Niels Bakker (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Charles Sprickman (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Peter Galbavy (Apr 06)
- RE: Mailserver requirements Mike Walter (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Arnold Nipper (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Daniel Roesen (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Arnold Nipper (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Daniel Roesen (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Jim Segrave (Apr 06)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Arnold Nipper (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Richard Welty (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Niels Bakker (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Jeff Workman (Apr 05)
- Re: Mailserver requirements Richard Welty (Apr 05)