Re: Lazy network operators

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Randy Bush wrote:

> > We need one (or more) of the p2p vendors to support it.
> >    
>
> ask not what X can do for you, but what you can do for X.
> i.e., what does ipv6 do for the p2p vendors?
>
>  
More direct connections between the peers, instead of taking detours 
through the "pull mode internet" where you need to find a common meeting 
point somewhere which is not obscured by address mangling. And because 
of many NAT´s today limit the number of flows per subscriber, you also 
should get more performance, which is something that directly appeals to 
end users.

Pete