nanog mailing list archives
Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:07:51 -0400
At 05:56 PM 4/22/2004, Dan Hollis wrote:
Is there any way to move BGP completely out-of-band? I know multihop may be out of the question but maybe someone should write up a proposal for PTP links. :-)
BGP over PPP? Could be specified, but that'd require replacing the use of TCP. Might be a bit ugly to implement, especially on larger routers with separate control planes.
Current thread:
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Joe Rhett (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability James (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Deepak Jain (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability James (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Dan Hollis (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rob Thomas (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability E.B. Dreger (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Alexei Roudnev (Apr 22)