![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?
From: Matthew Crocker <matthew () crocker com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:43:17 -0400
On Apr 5, 2004, at 10:49 AM, Andy Johnson wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with this device? Turntide.com. Looks like atraffic-shaping device designed specifically for cutting down spammersthroughput to your inbound SMTP servers. My main concern is, how does it make the distinction between legitimate mass-mailings (e.g.: mailing lists such as this one), and spam? Interesting approach to killing spam though Imust say.
Sounds like YABA (Yet Another Band Aid) solution for spam. If rate-limiting the spam packets does an effective job at killing spam. It will only make the spammers switch to a distrubuted attack method using trojaned virus hosts sending 1 mail message at a time. They are already doing this in some cases. SPAM is a living breathing entity that can learn and adapt. The smarter the network gets at killing it off, the smarter it gets in attacking. The evolution of spam/viruses is astounding and getting quicker all the time. The turntide box may be a good solution but it is expensive, I'll wait for the SNORT add-on that does the same thing ;)
-Matt
Current thread:
- Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Andy Johnson (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Matthew Crocker (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Andy Johnson (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Paul Vixie (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Paul Vixie (Apr 05)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Michael . Dillon (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Joe Abley (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Matthew Crocker (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 06)