nanog mailing list archives
Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability
From: Joe Rhett <jrhett () isite net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:06:52 -0700
I've left your entire message below so that one can see I've removed nothing. Winstar has made NONE of the statements you are interpreting from their response. They have simply stated that they don't support it at this moment in time. I'll grant you that they could have answered "when" or "why" or "what else". But they certainly didn't say anything you are suggesting that they have said. <joke>Should we ever meet, I'll remember to never turn down a beer. You might think I'm pro-prohibition or something...</joke> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:44:44PM -0700, Rodney Joffe wrote:
Perhaps we are all making too much of this... It appears that Winstar feels that there is no need for MD5 authentication of peering sessions. One of our customers has just had the following response from Winstar following a request to implement MD5 on their OC3 connection to Winstar. My first suggestion is to locate another upstream provider (they have 3 already). However, perhaps someone from Winstar would care to help us all understand what the alternative solution is to securing the session via MD5? I would *love* an alternative to the 5 days of work we've just gone through.-----Original Message----- From: Justin Crawford - NMCW Engineer [mailto:jcrawford () winstar net] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 11:13 AM To: xxxxxx Subject: Re: *****SPAM***** MD5 implimentation on BGP xxxxx, Winstar does not currently run MD5 authentication with our peers. Thanks Justin Thank you for your time and business Justin Crawford Winstar NMCW Ph: 206-xxx.xxxxHas anyone else run in to this with Winstar? -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(SM)
-- Joe Rhett Chief Geek JRhett () Isite Net Isite Services, Inc.
Current thread:
- Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 20)
- Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability John Brown (CV) (Apr 20)
- Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Andy Dills (Apr 20)
- Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 20)
- Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Charles Sprickman (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Joe Rhett (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Dan Hollis (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability James (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability E.B. Dreger (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Pekka Savola (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability E.B. Dreger (Apr 21)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 20)
- Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability John Brown (CV) (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Joe Rhett (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)