nanog mailing list archives

Re: TCP vulnerability

From: Aviva Garrett <aviva () juniper net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:59:52 -0700


In message <1386.64.235.224.55.1082482608.squirrel () mail mzima net>you write:


Since no one's mentioned it yet, apparently there was a change in plans.
It was just released a day early.


This is because of the story at http://www.washingtonpost.com/, in the
Technology section.

Thanks,
..Aviva


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=528&e=1&u=/ap/20040420/ap_on_

  > hi_te/internet_threat


And the official one:

http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm

Grant

-- 
Grant A. Kirkwood - grant(at)tnarg.org
Fingerprint = D337 48C4 4D00 232D 3444 1D5D 27F6 055A BF0C 4AED

Current thread:

TCP vulnerability Grant A. Kirkwood (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Aviva Garrett (Apr 20)
  - Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Randy Bush (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Stephen Stuart (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Tom (UnitedLayer) (Apr 20)
- Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 20)
  - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Sean Donelan (Apr 20)
  - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Mike Tancsa (Apr 20)
    - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think David Luyer (Apr 20)

(Thread continues...)