nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lazy network operators
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:42:45 -0700
Paul Jakma wrote: Hmmm, or rather, there just wont be any demand for IPv6 deployment, at least from the edges (consumers, small/medium networks).
Oh oh I see another one taking the path that leads to the dark side. _.-'~~~~~~`-._ / || \ / || \ | || | | _______||_______ | |/ ----- \/ ----- \| / ( ) ( ) \ / \ ----- () ----- / \ / \ /||\ / \ / \ /||||\ / \ / \ /||||||\ / \ /_ \o========o/ _\ `--...__|`-._ _.-'|__...--' | `' |
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Daniel Senie (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Payne (Apr 15)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 16)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 17)
- RE: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 18)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 18)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 19)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 18)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 18)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 18)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 19)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Carlos Friacas (Apr 19)
- RE: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 14)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 18)