nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers)
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:34:52 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!
No mistake, although 12.149.189.2 is a customer's NS it uses AT&T's NS as the resolver. We've have complaints from other AT&T users about the same thing, as does another DNSBL (SpamCop), and there's now an answer from AT&T to one of their customers who forwarded AT&Ts response: "I finally talked to someone who knows what the problem is. Your sbl sites have been blocked by the standard DNS forwarders supplied by ATT. This is due to the workload being generated on them from mailservers."
Duh! This is really dumb. Will they also block microsoft in their forwarders when there are new patches like last week, thats also generating NS traffic... Unbelievable. Bye, Raymond.
Current thread:
- Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Steve Linford (Apr 14)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) jlewis (Apr 17)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Steve Linford (Apr 17)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 17)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Michael . Dillon (Apr 19)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 19)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) just me (Apr 19)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 19)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Joe Abley (Apr 19)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Steve Linford (Apr 17)
- Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) Paul Vixie (Apr 19)