nanog mailing list archives
RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking
From: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace () attglobal net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:44:29 -0400
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:38:54 -0500, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS wrote:
It looks like you as an attglobal.net customer might have received it from another attglobal.net user
Yes this is what I suspected
(or else there was other header forgery going on - it looks like you didn't provide complete headers?)
This was the complete header and that is what is so bizarre about the spam
Abuse () att net may look a lot like a black hole,
yes :(
Current thread:
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking, (continued)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Jay Hennigan (Apr 14)
- Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 14)
- Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking John Curran (Apr 14)
- Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Peter Galbavy (Apr 15)
- Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Geo. (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Gary E. Miller (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Gary E. Miller (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL (Apr 14)
- RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 14)