nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:36:51 +0300
Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:
If we change the email system architecture so that every node in the architecture only accepts mail from known sources and enforces a pre-arranged behavior pattern,
Although I fail not to sound like a broken record here; Say hello to the X.400 guys when you meet them... Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?, (continued)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Michael . Dillon (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dave Howe (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Erik Haagsman (Apr 07)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Dan Hollis (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? Petri Helenius (Apr 06)