nanog mailing list archives
Re: Worst design decisions?
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Palmer wrote: : > ...and combine that with the RJ45 connecters that have a rubber hood over : > the release. Grrrrr! : Thats to prevent it from being disconnected accidentally : (or for any other reason :->) Actually, the original intent of those hoods was to snagproof the locking tab -- which is of interest to places that have the Web O' Patch Panel Cables. Think "pull a disconnected cable out of the tangled mess and try not to break off the locking tab". 8-) So it's a tradeoff between preserving the RJ45 connector and making it easy to disconnect. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>
Current thread:
- Re: Worst design decisions?, (continued)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Aaron Dewell (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Petri Helenius (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? bdragon (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Shawn Solomon (Sep 17)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Casassa, Nathan (Sep 17)
- RE: Worst design decisions? trelane (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Matt (Sep 19)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Daryl G. Jurbala (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? John Palmer (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Todd Vierling (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? up (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Luke Starrett (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Charles Sprickman (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Nathan Eric Norman (Sep 18)