nanog mailing list archives

Re: Worst design decisions?


From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:57:11 -0400 (EDT)


Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:


Hello all,

Was doing some upgrades on a UBR7246 (to a VXR), and I got to thinking 
about short sighted design considerations.  I was curious if any of you 
had some pet peeves from a design perspective to rant about.  I'll start 
with a couple.


1) The slide lock on transceiver cables.

2) Intel's+IBM's "640K" wall.

3) IDE addressing standards. (We've been through the 528 MB,
2.1 GB, 4.2 GB, 8.4 GB caps.... what's next?)


2 & 3 are basically failures to look ahead far enough. We have
lots of those. Some would say IPV4 is one, but I'll give them
a little more credit than most....


 


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433


Current thread: