nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISC Patches
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson () greendragon com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:56:31 -0400
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> said:On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Losher wrote: : The official announcements are going out via the bind-announce () isc org : list, but just in case: : : http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html I know you aren't favorable to doing the work internally to ISC, but has anyone scoped out the effort involved in backporting this to BIND 8?I'm interested in that as well (BIND 9 as a recursive server on Tru64 doesn't work in my experience), but I would suggest any discussion about that move over to the BIND list or the USENET gateway comp.protocols.dns.bind.
Just as long as a pointer to the result is posted back here for those of us that are not BIND workers (merely BIND users). We are only running BIND 8, and although I'm about to try 9 on our dedicated mail recursor today ('cause we need this badly as our queues fill), I'm reluctant to just toss it in customer facing recursors yet. -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Current thread:
- ISC Patches Peter Losher (Sep 17)
- Re: ISC Patches Todd Vierling (Sep 17)
- Re: ISC Patches Chris Adams (Sep 17)
- Re: ISC Patches William Allen Simpson (Sep 17)
- BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Paul Vixie (Sep 17)
- Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Todd Vierling (Sep 17)
- Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Doug Barton (Sep 18)
- Re: ISC Patches Chris Adams (Sep 17)
- Re: ISC Patches Todd Vierling (Sep 17)