nanog mailing list archives
RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time!
From: "Christopher Bird" <seabird () msn com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:33:58 -0500
Thank you Henry, Peter, Mehdi, Todd, Bob, Irwin, Tracy, John, Karsten, Karl, Shawn. Howard, Darren, Mike and Paul for taking the time to answer. This has helped greatly. Regards Chris
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Christopher Bird Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:39 PM To: Nanog () merit edu Subject: IP telephony There has been much buzz of late about using IP telephony solutions in place of the more common analog based solutions. Traditional telephony has very high reliability (many years without loss of dial tone for some companies). From what I have seen in this group about networking, router behaviors, etc. it seems to me that the IP networks that exist aren't yet ready for the prime time of IP telephony. As we move buildings, my company is looking at installing an IP telephony based solution (packet switched) instead of a traditional analog based solution (circuit switched). I am worried that the reliability will likely be lower than I am used to. However the cost savings look quite compelling, so I am torn. The more I read in here about threats and attacks against IP networks and the amount of maintenance we need to have in place to keep our IP networks hanging together, the more I am concerned about the viability of an IP telephony solution. Does anyone here have any thoughts, experiences, etc. about the use of IP telephony in corporate environments? Thanks in advance Chris
Current thread:
- IP telephony Christopher Bird (Sep 16)
- Re: IP telephony Henry Linneweh (Sep 16)
- Re: IP telephony Petri Helenius (Sep 17)
- Re: IP telephony Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 17)
- RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time! Christopher Bird (Sep 17)