nanog mailing list archives

RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time!


From: "Christopher Bird" <seabird () msn com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:33:58 -0500


Thank you Henry, Peter, Mehdi, Todd, Bob, Irwin, Tracy, John, Karsten,
Karl, Shawn. Howard, Darren, Mike and Paul for taking the time to
answer. This has helped greatly.

Regards

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On 
Behalf Of Christopher Bird
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Nanog () merit edu
Subject: IP telephony



There has been much buzz of late about using IP telephony 
solutions in place of the more common analog based solutions.

Traditional telephony has very high reliability (many years 
without loss of dial tone for some companies). From what I 
have seen in this group about networking, router behaviors, 
etc. it seems to me that the IP networks that exist aren't 
yet ready for the prime time of IP telephony. As we move 
buildings, my company is looking at installing an IP 
telephony based solution (packet switched) instead of a 
traditional analog based solution (circuit switched). I am 
worried that the reliability will likely be lower than I am 
used to. However the cost savings look quite compelling, so I am torn.

The more I read in here about threats and attacks against IP 
networks and the amount of maintenance we need to have in 
place to keep our IP networks hanging together, the more I am 
concerned about the viability of an IP telephony solution.

Does anyone here have any thoughts, experiences, etc. about 
the use of IP telephony in corporate environments?

Thanks in advance

Chris

 









Current thread: