nanog mailing list archives
Neeed a new RFC?
From: Roy <garlic () garlic com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:46:55 -0700
We need a peremptive strike to create our own RFC that says not to do this. Ray Wong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:07:21PM -0600, John Neiberger wrote:http://apnews.excite.com/article/20030916/D7TJOF3G0.html --my favorite: VeriSign spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy said Tuesday that individual service providers were free to configure their systems so customers would bypass Site Finder. But he questioned whether releasing a patch to do so would violate Internet standards. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What else is there to say? Any bets that Verisign tries to accuse ISC of being a terrorist organization once the patch comes out? At the least a spurious lawsuit seems certain.
Current thread:
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch, (continued)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Richard Irving (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Richard Irving (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David Lesher (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Dominic J. Eidson (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Crist Clark (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Chris Boyd (Sep 18)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David G. Andersen (Sep 17)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Sep 17)
- Charlotte, NC Services Wanted Ray Burkholder (Sep 16)
- Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 17)