nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verisign's legal woes???


From: michael <michael () aplatform com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT)


Hello Roy,

And what about host names that are RESERVED?
do a whois on a.com or many of the single letter .com and .net  Most are
IANA RESERVED yet host on anyof those returns 64.94.110.11

Michael...

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Roy wrote:

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:50:45 -0700
From: Roy <garlic () garlic com>
To: "nanog () merit edu" <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: Verisign's legal woes???


I am just wondering how long until some sharp lawyer sues the heck out
of Verisign.

While one could argue about who owns unregistered names, there is little
or no question about who owns registered names.  Verisign's current
implementation breaks down for registered names that are not in the zone
for some reason.   The legal problems

1.  This could be considered hijacking of the domain name

2.  If the domain name is trademarked, it could be a trademark violation

3.  If a registered name goes on HOLD for a day, mail service is
suspended (most MTAs keep retrying when the name doesn't resolve).
Under the new scheme it all bounces

4.  By bouncing mail using the name, it could be the unauthorized use of
a domain (that's a crime in California)

If one wants to experiment, use dorkslayers.com as your test case.  Its
a valid paid-for active domain name with no nameservers.

Might make a nice class action suit on behalf of all the owners of
domain names that aren't in the zone.  Could be worth a lot of legal fees.



Current thread: