nanog mailing list archives
Re: What *are* they smoking?
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:45:19 +0200
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:17:59PM -0400, Matthew Crocker wrote:
This is sufficiently technically and business slimy that I would null-route that IP, personally.Nah, just route it to a Linux box with transparent proxy and show your own 'Websites-R-Us' page to your customers.
Or a "VeriSign's business practices" page. Unbelievable where Internet got over the last 10 years. Looks like the last cluons at VeriSign were eaten up by their sales/marketing departments (finally). Now they are "hijacking" two complete gTLD namespaces... VeriSign: WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? And don't try to tell us that you want to "help" users who mistype addresses. You want to make money with typos, that's all. Any "Site Finder" stuff is absurd by itself. Shaking head, Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking?, (continued)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 16)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? bmanning (Sep 16)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 16)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jack Bates (Sep 16)
- RE: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Eric Germann (Sep 16)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jack Bates (Sep 17)
- Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jay Hennigan (Sep 16)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Matthew Crocker (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Daniel Roesen (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Marc Slemko (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 15)
- Re: What *are* they smoking? Christopher X. Candreva (Sep 15)
- bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Sep 16)
- Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 17)
- Re: public resolver Doron Shikmoni (Sep 17)
- Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Paul Vixie (Sep 17)
- Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 18)