nanog mailing list archives
Re: BMITU
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 01:46:40 -0400
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:11:41 PDT, Jim Shankland said:
Hans Reiser would argue that that reflects a limitation of the filesystem, rather than of qmail; and that apps should not have to code around such unreasonable filesystem limitations. And reiserfs goes to considerable effort to achieve good performance on directories containing thousands of small files. This would imply that if you're going to use qmail in a high-volume environment, you might consider using reiserfs, also.
I'd recommend also tracking/testing reiser4 in your testbed - the early benchmarks on it are quite astounding....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: BMITU, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: BMITU Robert Boyle (Sep 04)
- RE: BMITU Fisher, Shawn (Sep 04)
- RE: BMITU Fisher, Shawn (Sep 04)
- Re: BMITU Ray Wong (Sep 04)
- RE: BMITU Austad, Jay (Sep 04)
- RE: BMITU Robert Bridgham (Sep 05)
- RE: BMITU McBurnett, Jim (Sep 06)
- Re: BMITU Jim Shankland (Sep 06)
- Re: BMITU Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 06)