nanog mailing list archives
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering?
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:44:32 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
I know this is easily done with vendor C. I suspect that the other vendors have implemented something very similar (heard J was easier than C).
"Neglecting gravity and friction, it is trivial to show that..." The issues with vendor C, J, N, L, R, P and A through Z have been repeatedly discussed and are available in the archives should anyone care to do the research. It is also a mistake to assume that all network architectures are the same as yours, or that your architecture would scale to solve the problems other network providers need to solve. The use of source address validation is expanding. Unfortunately SAV's effectiveness is declining due to the increase of trojan bots.
Current thread:
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering?, (continued)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Adam Debus (Sep 04)
- RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? Terry Baranski (Sep 06)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Petri Helenius (Sep 07)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Petri Helenius (Sep 04)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jack Bates (Sep 04)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Owen DeLong (Sep 04)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 05)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jack Bates (Sep 06)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Sean Donelan (Sep 06)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Sean Donelan (Sep 08)
- Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? bdragon (Sep 12)