nanog mailing list archives
Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)
From: Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:25:23 +0000
Hello Paul , All , Is there a url listing the TLD's that officially use wild cards in their deployment ?
nope. right now you just have to know. we're trying to keep a list of places that either use wildcards and have been accepted by the community, or don't use wildcards but run bind8 or other old broken software that incorrectly sends answers rather than referrals when queried for data held as subzone glue...
see www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html for details.
...and that's where you'll find it. it's very possible that declaring a small number of zones delegation-only will be less work and less intrusive than trying to find/list the exceptions.
Current thread:
- Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries rgaglian (Sep 19)
- Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries Doug Barton (Sep 19)
- bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sep 20)
- Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 20)
- Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sep 20)
- Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 23)
- Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sep 20)
- Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries Doug Barton (Sep 19)