nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign Capitulates
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () gurunet net>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:03:50 -0400
"... in an attempt to assert a dubious right to regulate non-registry services."
This explains everything. They don't believe the stability of com and net are in any way related to their registry duties. That quote alone should be sufficient to deny them custody of com and net.
Current thread:
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates, (continued)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Scott Weeks (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates George Bakos (Oct 03)
- Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates Mike Tancsa (Oct 03)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates Haesu (Oct 03)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates jeffrey.arnold (Oct 03)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates Petri Helenius (Oct 03)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates David G. Andersen (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates George Bakos (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Scott Weeks (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Allen McRay (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Haesu (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Kevin Loch (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates E.B. Dreger (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Will Yardley (Oct 04)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 06)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 06)