nanog mailing list archives
Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail
From: "Brian Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:09:20 -0400
I'm getting nothing but timeouts at this point to any of att's mail servers. Nothing going through at all. -------------------------- Brian Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources http://www.sosdg.org ICQ: 8077511 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme () multicasttech com> To: "Mike Tancsa" <mike () sentex net> Cc: <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 5:57 PM Subject: Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail
Here is my experience (names are changed to protect...) : Failed to deliver to 'AAA () att com' SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your AT&T contact. [3] Failed to deliver to 'BBB () att com' SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your AT&T contact. [3] Failed to deliver to 'CCC () att com' SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your AT&T contact. [3] Failed to deliver to 'DDD () att com' SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your AT&T contact. [3] Failed to deliver to 'EEE () att com' SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your AT&T contact. [3] On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:Wow, this sounds like a pretty extreme shotgun approach. (or is it April 1st somewhere). Is AT&T going to make this whitelist publicly available ? Perhaps if there was some global white list that everyone could consult against, it might be a little more useable. Still, what do you do about multi-stage relays ? ---Mike
Current thread:
- Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Jeff Wasilko (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Marshall Eubanks (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Tony Rall (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Mike Tancsa (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Marshall Eubanks (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Brian Bruns (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Marshall Eubanks (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Crist Clark (Oct 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Jamie Reid (Oct 21)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Steve Bellovin (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Kee Hinckley (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Sean Donelan (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Oct 22)
- Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail Todd Vierling (Oct 23)