nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISC causes stability problems
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson () greendragon com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:34:59 -0400
Sean Donelan wrote:
An "anonymous reader" using almost identical language to Verisign .... Usage of the patch unexpectedly broke at least 7 Top Level Domains, ISC announced 3 weeks later, after users started having problems.
Where? I cannot find the announcement.
... how will the Verisign GRS make the wildcard capability available to all ICANN acredited .COM and .NET registrars without creating a conflict of interest? Why shouldn't all ICANN accredited registrars be able to enter wildcards in the .COM and .NET zone files on a equal access basis? Or is the Verisign GRS favoring its corporate sibling by entering special information in the .COM or .NET zone files for its sibling's benefit without offering the same capability to all other registrars.
Good point!
Registry Code of Conduct http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-appi-com-25may01.htm
Also handy! Thanks! -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Current thread:
- ISC causes stability problems Sean Donelan (Oct 15)
- Re: ISC causes stability problems William Allen Simpson (Oct 18)
- Re: ISC causes stability problems Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 18)
- VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business Mark Vallar (Oct 18)
- Re: VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business Henry Linneweh (Oct 18)
- Re: VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business Ray Bellis (Oct 18)
- Re: VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business Jeff Shultz (Oct 18)
- Re: ISC causes stability problems Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 18)
- Re: ISC causes stability problems William Allen Simpson (Oct 18)