nanog mailing list archives
Re: WLAN shielding
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:41:10 -0800 (PST)
--- Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:
Planning on limiting signal using a physicalmechanism of some sort's justa little too scifi to be useful.It's too much effort to shield the room itself, but you might want to try making the inverse square law work for you by shielding all of the wireless antennae so that the signal is too weak to travel more than a meter or two. Put extra shielded wireless access points on the conference tables so that everyone can place their laptops within range of a signal.
However, if you're talking about one room only, and you're trying to prevent outsiders from sniffing, why not just use a cheap workgroup switch/hub? Having to buy multiple WAPs and insulate them quickly destroys the wireless value-add... -David Barak ===== David Barak -fully RFC 1925 compliant- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Current thread:
- WLAN shielding Andy Grosser (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding Doug Luce (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding Stephen L Johnson (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding Marco Davids (SARA) (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding Niels Bakker (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding David Lesher (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding Sean Donelan (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding David Lesher (Nov 27)
- Re: WLAN shielding Sean Donelan (Nov 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WLAN shielding Michael . Dillon (Nov 26)
- Re: WLAN shielding David Barak (Nov 26)