nanog mailing list archives
Re: TAT 14 failure
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:32:50 -0500 (EST)
Is there not sizeable UK<->FR capacity through the Chunnel? That seems like such an easy win, I'd assume everyone else thought of it years ago.. -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- TAT 14 failure jmalcolm (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jared Mauch (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jared Mauch (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TAT 14 failure garrett . allen (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure garrett . allen (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Leo Bicknell (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Jack McCarthy (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure David Lesher (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Simon Lockhart (Nov 25)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Vincent Gillet (Nov 26)
- Re: TAT 14 failure Leo Bicknell (Nov 25)