nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:16:43 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuits properly due to whatever brokeass vendor you're using. :)
... which doesn't take into account distance. Assume for a moment you sell a customer a port in Newark, NYC, and London. Clearly, a bit from nyc to newark should be priced differently than one from nyc to london. Agreed?
Current thread:
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] joshua sahala (Nov 25)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 25)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Alex Rubenstein (Nov 25)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Eric Osborne (Nov 25)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 26)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Alex Rubenstein (Nov 25)
- Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]] Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 25)