nanog mailing list archives
RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network
From: Peter John Hill <phill () andrew cmu edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:31:53 -0500
--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:19 AM -0300 Lucas Iglesias <l.iglesias () tiba com> wrote:
As I know, according to the routing theory, it has no sense to have 2 interfaces on the same net. At least, on Cisco routers is not allowed.
It would make much more sense to have two routers connected to the same subnet... VRRP/HSRP, separate IPv4 and IPv6 routers. If the two interfaces are bridged together, there is no obvious benefit to having a secondary interface, which is sort of what the result below would accomplish. Decent routers would be doing everything in hardware...
Perhaps it would be wise to figure out what they really want, maybe by asking what they think that want, and then telling them how it should be done... If they want to have more bandwidth with two router interfaces, there are better solutions to this problem. If it were seriously a /16 subnet on the customer side, that pretty much means they aren't doing any routing that I would want to have a part of on their side. I hope those are examples with really wacky subnets, because that is pretty unrealistic.
So, no, no good reason. They probably are trying to do something and need some guidance, perhaps they should post what they want to do here. I am sure they will get some "interesting" responses.
Peter
-----Mensaje original----- De: Sugar, Sylvia [mailto:truesylvia () yahoo co uk] Enviado el: Martes, 11 de Noviembre de 2003 05:36 a.m. Para: nanog () trapdoor merit edu Asunto: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its two interfaces, say configured as, 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. Theoretically, i see nothing which can stop a router from doing this. But practically, is it of any use? And if used, then, when and why will somebody want to use such a kind of configuration?
Current thread:
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network, (continued)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Leo Bicknell (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Crist Clark (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network sthaug (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Leo Bicknell (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Neil J. McRae (Nov 12)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 12)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Shawn Solomon (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Paul S. Brown (Nov 11)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Lucas Iglesias (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Frank Louwers (Nov 11)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Peter John Hill (Nov 11)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Lucas Iglesias (Nov 11)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Truman, Michelle, RTSLS (Nov 11)
- RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Michel Py (Nov 11)
- Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Nov 11)