nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked IP space.
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 07:10:27 +0200 (IST)
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ray Wong wrote:
I'm starting to figure that, given the delays, there's been enough damage done that 204.89.224/24 will never be able to get off the blocking lists anyway, so perhaps I'll turn it back in afterall. *sigh*That's what I get for trying to find low-cost ISPs willing to announce portable space.
So a RIR giving out that /24 would in fact be selling "damaged goods" and the customer who got it would be able to sue. I think RIRs have to make a larger effort to protect their assets.
Ray Wong rayw () rayw net
-Hank
Current thread:
- Hijacked IP space. chuck goolsbee (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Andrew - Supernews (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. James Cowie (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Chris Lewis (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Ray Wong (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Ron da Silva (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. E.B. Dreger (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Hank Nussbacher (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. william (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. James Cowie (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Andrew - Supernews (Nov 03)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. william (Nov 04)
- Re: Hijacked IP space. Chris Lewis (Nov 04)