![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: .mil domain
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 22:33:58 -0400 (EDT)
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
I guess you were lucky then, the addresses we were smurfed from had no related website, and the phone # on the whois was outdated. When I finally did manage to get a hold of a network engineer they didnt seem particularly interested in hearing about the problem. Hence it took 3 months of constant calling to get their smurf amps shut down. And they *still* dont have a working abuse@ or postmaster@ which imho is simpy irresponsible for such an organization. Someone should get sacked.
Your escalation route goes to the OSD-CIO (Office of Secretary Defense) in the 5-sided building. That was Art Money's office but I don't know if he's still there. I'd cc: the Inspector General for whichever branch as well...and the FTC. -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- RE: .mil domain, (continued)
- RE: .mil domain Mark Borchers (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Mark T. Ganzer (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Ryan Mooney (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Richard Irving (May 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain) Kevin Day (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Tony Rowley (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Tony Rowley (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain David Lesher (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Jack Bates (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Avleen Vig (May 30)