nanog mailing list archives
Re: .mil domain
From: listuser () numbnuts net
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:57:26 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 01:15 PM 30/05/2003 -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote:For the same reason anyone else accepts their routes -- because they want to be able to reach them. If they don't want to reach _you_, that's their choice.As Sean Donelan pointed out, the fact that 2 of the root name servers are inside their network, there is more to the issue than you suggest.... I for example want people in Australia to be able to reliably lookup DNS info on my domains. The .mil people have decided to hamper this process.
I agree. The root servers should have no filtering in place to block any demographics (unless of course a given node is DoSing them). The last time I tried to contact a .mil to report an open relay that was being abused, I was accused of being a spammer that had "hacked" their server. Since that time I reject .mil mail. Justin
Current thread:
- .mil domain Steve Waddington (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Christopher L. Morrow (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain John Payne (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain John Payne (May 30)
- Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain) Sean Donelan (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Mike Tancsa (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain listuser (May 30)
- RE: .mil domain Mark Borchers (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Mark T. Ganzer (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Ryan Mooney (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Richard Irving (May 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain) Kevin Day (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Tony Rowley (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Dan Hollis (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Tony Rowley (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Dan Hollis (May 30)