nanog mailing list archives

Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized?


From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:05:03 -0400


On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:36:55PM -0700, brett watson wrote:

On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 23:27 America/Phoenix, Sean Donelan wrote:
Back to the original question Chris Morrow asked a long time ago.  What
should be considered acceptable proof?

If Paul Vixie showed up on my doorstep tomorrow, and asked me to route
192.5.5.0; what proof should I accept from him (or anyone) to 
demostrate
beyond a reasonable doubt he has the authority to route a particular
network?

oh!  i know!  because i know paul, and will personally vouch for him?

To which the response is usually something like:

"Then you are obviously a co-conspirator, and we will now begin
investigating your involvement. Please provide all of your information and
justify everything you are doing, before we post everything we can find on
you to a mailing list or newsgroup."

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)


Current thread: