nanog mailing list archives

Re: identity theft != spam

From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:13:55 -0700 (PDT)


      On Thu, 15 May 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote:
    > Well, the issues are perhaps a little more complex than you're portraying
    > them.  J.I. and I spent the better part of two years working on the
             ^^^

Sorry, J.D., as in Falk.  It's very early here.

                                -Bill

Current thread:

Re: identity theft != spam, (continued)
- Re: identity theft != spam John Payne (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Daniel Golding (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Horry (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Woodfield (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Charles Sprickman (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Vadim Antonov (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Peter Galbavy (May 16)
    - Re: identity theft != spam steve uurtamo (May 16)
- Re: identity theft != spam Bill Woodcock (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Bill Woodcock (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Steven M. Bellovin (May 15)