nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:17:09 -0400
Drew,
On a lighter note, who is going to IRAQ with me to deploy a Motorola Canopy 5.8Ghz WLAN network? :p
I'll be happy to stay in Portland and dither the dns, unless someone has auctioned it all off already, on the theory that it wasn't really needed for domestic purposes. I will send you your choice of (canned) chowder or (canned) beans however, which rate silghtly higher than MREs, at least on an edibility scale. .iq nic-ish data to me please. I'll fold and spindle it appropriately, and post as tar balls and zone files. Eric
Current thread:
- Re: NOC responses when advised of ongoing DoS attacks (Was Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)), (continued)
- Re: NOC responses when advised of ongoing DoS attacks (Was Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)) David Barak (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Stephen J. Wilcox (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Rob Pickering (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Daniel Senie (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Vijay Gill (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Joseph Noonan (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Daniel Golding (May 06)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 05)