nanog mailing list archives
Re: State Super-DMCA Too True
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:32:52 -0600
Thus spake "Kuhtz, Christian" <christian.kuhtz () bellsouth com>
[..]AT&T/Comcast doesn't sell business accounts (at least not here) but they will now sell you a more expensive package, 3.5Mbit/384kbit, for $95/mo, including 'model rental fee', it includes 5 IP addresses "VPN Capability"(?) as well.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Perhaps that is advertised as such because of issues around VPN clients behind NAT/PAT devices. Some work better than others. Having a non-NAT address stops most of those issues. Or, that's me trying to figure out what a marketeer might've been thinking. Ugh. Ouch. Stop. That hurts. Quit it. Ouch. Ouch.
Some cable ISPs block IPsec and PPTP for "residential" service, claiming VPNs are only used by telecommuters and thus require their more expensive "business" services. S Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
Current thread:
- RE: State Super-DMCA Too True, (continued)
- RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 31)
- RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
- RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)