nanog mailing list archives
NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:59:06 -0600
todd glassey wrote:
Actually I proposed that NANOG also consider several splinter lists. Including one concerned with the Legal Issues with operating network services, and since there are jail terms being talked about I suggest that these are now sub-organizations who's time as come.
I completely agree, Todd. I think that the legal aspects are relevant to NANOG, but there are some who feel that it is excess in their mailbox and deters them from the technical aspects of networking.
-Jack
Current thread:
- NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 31)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Krzysztof Adamski (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
- Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
- RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Kris Foster (Mar 31)