nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP to doom us all
From: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair () vredenburg com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:00:55 -0800
Good point, Sean. The problem is the business process and the risk to the process, vs. the cost to fix it. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean () donelan com] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:25 PM To: 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: Re: BGP to doom us all On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jim Deleskie wrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed Seems the BGP will be the down fall of the internet, the sky is falling
the
sky is falling
Other than pending patents and a cool name Secure BGP, you still have the fundamental problem. Garbage In, Garbage Out. The only difference is now you have Secure Garbage(tm). There is a problem that needs to be solved. But like the whole micro-payments, SET, etc thing; if the solution is more complicated and more expensive than the alternatives; it won't get used no matter how "secure" it is.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 01)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Mar 01)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Andy Dills (Mar 01)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 02)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all E.B. Dreger (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
- RE: BGP to doom us all St. Clair, James (Mar 03)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all David Conrad (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)