![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 69/8...this sucks
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:42:03 +0100
* spork () inch com (Charles Sprickman) [Wed 12 Mar 2003, 00:22 CET]:
Seriously though, somewhere there is a popular site that is non-profit in nature that would trade say a month of free access for the hassle of being put into a widely-blocked block.
Apparently hack.co.za has recently been resurrected; it's within 69.3/16, owned by Cogent. (Fugly traceroute, too.) I'm sure they'll appreciate your offer of another mirror! Regards, -- Niels. -- subvertise me
Current thread:
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks), (continued)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Tim Thorne (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Niels Bakker (Mar 13)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks ed (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Larry J. Blunk (Mar 11)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rick Duff (Mar 11)