nanog mailing list archives

Re: scope of the 69/8 problem


From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:03:14 -0600


Thus spake "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
If the roots and gTLDs are truly unwilling to help, and a handful
of entities can't cooperate, I have serious concerns why they
have been handed responsibility for such a critical piece of
infrastructure.  I'd expect "it's too hard to be a good netizen"
whining on other lists... but NANOG?  Roots and TLDs?

Perhaps this is an omen of the Internet yet to come.  Oh joy.

Come on, you're asking the root and/or TLD operators to renumber their
servers -- not a trivial task -- every few months to intentionally disable
their own service for what amounts to an academic experience.

These folks are in the business of running a critical system that requires
100% uptime for hundreds of millions of users, and they do a damned good
job.  Let them do it in peace, and find some other "must have" service (like
porn) to put in 69/8.

S

Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice."  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS        dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking


Current thread: