nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port 80 Issues
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 02:20:03 -0500 (EST)
Would this also explain the problem reports I was getting from users of cable modems in St. Louis last night around Midnight local time? They were having trouble reaching several well known web sites for several hours. On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John Murphy wrote:
AT&T has resolved the issue with their router in St. Louis. Thanks to those who responded off-list, your information was a large help. Apologies to those of you who were apparently offended by the vagueness of my initial query, I was fishing for any information I could find at the time.
Current thread:
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues), (continued)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Sean Donelan (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Vadim Antonov (Mar 10)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
- Re: Port 80 Issues Sean Donelan (Mar 08)