nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:30:53 -0800
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:57:22PM -0500, Eric Germann wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/03/07/speed.record/index.html Comments folks?
"Given enough thrust, pigs fly just fine...demonstrated by a professional driver on a closed track, please do not try this at home kids!" Sure, given a link you don't have to share with production traffic and a lot of charity, it's possible to get TCP to do a lot of things. This doesn't make them a good idea (outside of those `special' environments.) On the other hand, if you have the need for this kind of single stream performance, and the pipe to yourself, why not devise your own protocol with less overhead? --msa
Current thread:
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ..., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Galbavy (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andy Dills (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Scott Weeks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Miles Fidelman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andrew Dorsett (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jessica Yu (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 10)